See G-Spot Run.
18/01/2010
A couple weeks back a study came out saying the G-Spot is a figment of our imagination. Asking twins to self-report about their ability to achieve g-spot orgasms proves little…except that not enough people are getting off this way. So I decided to set off on my own little search of the elusive oasis.
First off. Let’s say: all’s well that ends well. I found mine but hey I’ve been exploring for awhile. Discovering the g-spot was relatively easy though recognizing the g-spot as such was more difficult. As I worked the sweet spot, I expected to become Frank Zappa’s G-Spot Tornado complete with acrobatic dancers, orchestra, flowers and standing ovations. It’s supposed to be more profound than a clitoral orgasm, no?
Now that I was reassured my own g-spot had not decamped I wanted to check how other ladies were faring:
Yeesh. Poor women at The View can’t find it, don’t want to find it or if they are young blonde and pregnant are too embarrassed to admit they found it. Do watch until the end for the conspiracy theory about g-spot’s being conceived for a man’s benefit.
Entry Filed under: Reviews. Tags: g-spot, orgasms, scientific study, sex, talk shows.
2 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
Tanya
Jess.
1.
J | 18/01/2010 at 15:31
More profound? Not so sure… More spectacular, for sure, especially if you get an ejaculation from it. But I prefer to refer to sex in terms of pleasure and desires rather than performance. A performance will be repetitive, but desires often change depending on the mood you’re in, or on which dreams and fantasies you had…
And it really depends from one person from another. I know women that have stronger orgasms from clit stimulation, and others that get annoyance or boredom from it.
That reminds me of your other post about sexbots… Will these machines be programmable? Let’s say, 70% vaginal, 25% clit and 5% anal stimulations? Or for paying attention to other body parts (rub thighs, butts, hips or feet) ? Will they repeat constantly the same performance?
2.
Jess. | 18/01/2010 at 17:27
J! Thanks for another comment
I think what probably came across from my post is a debate I have about expressing desire through sexualist (goal-orientated) vs. sensualist (all about process) sex that is a constant undercurrent. I know I know it shouldn’t be either/ or but I do think some of us are just more interested in one or another. It defines how we like to get it on and get off.
Oh now comes the fun part : the robot. I think the thing with these robots is they are responsive to humans and able to act according to a pre-conceived profile. So the programming is less rigid. I.E. you make a profile of the kind of sex you want and the “personality” of the robot and then it acts accordingly. I imagine the robot would be more flexible to change drastically to meet our desires and requirements than one particular human lover ever could.
I am most interested in the meticulous skill and extra-human abilities (forked tongue or two penises perhaps?) and maybe a button that lets me control their reaction to my progression ie. If on the verge of orgasm I decide I would like to experience a tandem orgasm I would press the button on my robot’s shoulder and it would come too. Blamo! Oh geez I think I got over-invested in results again.